Archive for the ‘Hilary-Clinton’ Category

Passport Breaches: Dirty Tricks or Epidemic of Incompetence?

March 21, 2008

First it was Obama Barack’s passport information that was violated, three times.  Now it comes out that Hilary Clinton and John McCain have been snooped on as well.

 While the possibility of political dirty tricks is real, a better guess is bored, ill-trained and unethical employees [or 'contractors' brought in to handle the last passport crisis mishandled/created by the Bush Administration] saying ‘Check this out!’ to one another. 

Look out, Amanda Beard, Kim Kardashian, Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Clay Aiken or anyone briefly in the public eye–or living next door to or dating a passport employee.  Your true age, true name and destinations are probably being gawked at right now.  Scott McNeely was right.  Privacy?  No mas.

As for the ‘contractors’ fired by the State Department, not to worry.  They have a bright future at the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), staring at the prescription pills of passengers and fondling their packed underwear.

Obama Aide Learns There’s No “Off the Record”

March 11, 2008

No.  As professor and writer Samantha Powers found out last week, you can’t do it.  There is no off the record.

Powers, an adviser to Barack Obama, was quoted in The Scotsman as saying of the Hilary Clinton campaign “They’re obsessed…she’s a monster..and that’s off the record.”  That late defense didn’t work; she ended up resigning from the campaign and apologizing.  Her unfortunate but newsworthy comment also overwhelmed Powers’ actual agenda–to use the press to promote her new .

As a media trainer for many international companies, “everything you say is on the record” is a key point I try to pound home with impressionable young product managers and less-impressionable, ‘know-it-all’ senior management.  They blanch when I tell them, “If you’re drinking with a journalist until 3AM at a Las Vegas trade show, anything he remembers will be on the Web the next day.”

If you are going to talk to the press, understand they’ll use your quotes if they’re interesting.  And don’t expect to be able to take back your words;  if Powers had called Hilary a “monster” on live television, whether she took it back or not, there’s no doubt that it would be on the record.

When Tucker Carlson challenged Scotsman reporter Gerri Peev for not heeding Powers’ plea to ignore her ‘monster’ comment, Gerri Peev asked, “Are you really that acquiescent in the United States?  In the United Kingdom, journalists believe that on or off the record is a principle that’s decided ahead of the interview.”

Carlson may be right  when he implies the UK press would sell out its mother to get a story.  Cutting their teeth chasing royals, the Brits are bolder.  When I worked at the National Enquirer (and made the near-fatal mistake of trying to keep up drinking with them) the unofficial motto seemed to be ‘if you need some shit get a Brit’.  

But while Peev may seem like a nasty piece of work, she’s just a tough-minded journalist  “If this is the first time that candid remarks have been published about what one campaign team thinks of the other candidate, then I would argue that your journalists aren’t doing a very good job of getting to the truth.”

That elusive truth is what journalists dig for.  And that’s why there’s no such thing as “off the record.”