Archive for the ‘Imus’ Category

The News You Don’t See

June 1, 2007

Bloggers often criticize the MSM, or mainstream media, for what gets covered and how.  Certainly there’s a lot to critize–but not necessarily along the political barricades bloggers typically man.

For example, FoxNews is often criticized as the Orwellian opposite to its “fair and balanced” slogan, generally promoting the Republican/conservative line. 

But what’s more interesting in terms of the news that doesn’t get covered by Fox (and other Fox-owned news outlets like SkyTV and the NY Post) are issues of democracy, religious liberty, human rights, forced sterilization under the one-child policy and anything else touchy on China. 

As the world’s largest Communist country, China, like North Korea and Venezuela, would be a natural target of Fox commentators, but according to reporters at the equally conserative Wall Street Journal, “News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch has a well-documented history of making editorial decisions in order to advance his business interests in China and, indeed, of sacrificing journalistic integrity to satisfy personal or political aims.” Fox has been conducting a China news blackout for years.

On the other side of the political divide, the Los Angeles Times is typically seen as a liberal publication.  Yet respected reporter Nancy Cleeland is leaving the publication in frustration at the Times’ lack of labor coverage.  Money quote:

“The Los Angeles region is defined by gaping income disparities and an enormous pool of low-wage immigrant workers, many of whom are pulled north by lousy, unstable jobs.  It’s also home to one of the most active and creative labor federations in the country.  But you wouldn’t know any of that from reading a typical issue of the L.A. Times, in print or online.  Increasingly anti-union in its editorial policy, and celebrity — and crime-focused in its news coverage, it ignores the economic discontent that is clearly reflected in ethnic publications such as La Opinion.”

Of course, she’s leaving with 55 other editorial staffers, a cutback  in the face of structural change and dire revenue loss . But things haven’t changed much in the 30 years since my father, a teacher’s union chapter chairman, told me that you’ll never see fair labor coverage in a newspaper because they’re employers themselves.

Whether a media outlet is left or right-leaning, commercial considerations always always influence editorial direction.

Lou Dobbs Brings Edge

May 11, 2007

So says Steve Friedman, producer of the The CBS Morning Show, now third in a three-horse morning show race, in an NPR segment.  Putting aside the question of how much “edge” viewers of the Charmin-soft morning shows can really handle, let’s hope that Lou Dobbs, who says he’s in the vanguard of ‘opinion anchors’ like Olbermann and O’Reilly, doesn’t bring as much edge to CBS as Don Imus and Janet Jackson.

60 Minutes Plays Softball with Lou Dobbs

May 7, 2007

After public relations disasters like Don Imus and Janet Jackson, it’s interesting that CBS, once called “the Tiffany network” would take a chance on the increasingly demagogic Lou Dobbs.

Now CNN’s Dobbs has not one but two networks  to lash out on.  On 60 Minutes Lesley Stahl asked a couple of tough questions, but mostly was bowled over by her new colleague’s charm offensive.  He even played the card. 

Stahl and Lou wrapped up by driving a tractor together, on the 300-acre New Jersey farm owned by this voice of the middle-class.

The End of the Madonna Theory

April 13, 2007

The Madonna theory states, roughly, that all publicity is good publicity.  Corollary: There is no such thing as bad publicity. (Other Madonna theories here.)

Professional public relations people protested, but to no avail.  Paris Hilton enthusiastically adopted it (although Paris is smart enough to always be very, very nice to photographers).  So did the trainwreck crowd (Lindsay, Britney, Ashley, etc).

But such ‘priceless’ worldwide publicity hasn’t helped Don Imus (although I’m cynical enough to say ‘yet’).   Even the Material Girl’s thick skin was pricked; she blamed the press, but she could have communicated her adoption story with more grace.  

The take-away: Know your story, work out your messages–and watch what you say.

BET Tackles the N-Word

April 12, 2007

Robert Johnson, founder of Black Entertainment Television, and his ex-wife, who owns a WNBA team, blasted Don Imus.  It smelled of hypocrisy, as BET devotes hours to broadcasting the very raunchiest of videos.  Then I saw this.

Imus, Pink, and Commercial Censorship

April 12, 2007

The other, CBS shoe  has dropped in the Don Imus ‘nappy-haired ho’s’ situation.  His departure will be unlamented by most except the media hacks who endure, ignore (or secretly enjoy) Imus’ stone age commentary as the price of publicizing themselves.

But the foot-in-mouth comment and hypocrisy backlash (including a famous Long Beach resident) bring up the issue of commercial censorship.  Imus is obviously free under the first amendment to say whatever he wants, but the paid speech interests of General Electric, its subsidiary NBC and suddenly conscious-stricken sponsors like General Motors, Staples and Bigelow Tea trump Imus’ free speech.

The singer Pink is in a similar situation on the other side of the political spectrum.  In an  , she thanked  Jimmy Kimmel as his was the only show willing to her song ‘Dear Mr. President’, where she asks

What kind of father would take his own daughter’s rights away?
And what kind of father might hate his own daughter if she were gay?
I can only imagine what the first lady has to say
You’ve come a long way from whiskey and cocaine.

Kimmel works for a third media giant, Disney/ABC, home of the now-gay friendly fairytale wedding.  But if Imus or Rosie O’Donnell’s experience is any indicator, Kimmel’s free speech leash may be shortened by the cash-carrying hand of corporate censorship.

Final questions: Is trying to be funny a sufficient defense against giving Imus-like offense–or do you actually have to be funny?