Archive for the ‘The-Huffington-Post’ Category

Huffington Post Reaches New Low: Update

October 25, 2007

My post on the poor writing and editing in the Huffington Post is getting lots of comment.  For the record, I have nothing against blogger Kristen Reeves, who I don’t know and to whom I wish every success.  But a ‘publication’ like the Huffington Post does its readers—and its writers–a disservice when it posts something like this. (By the way, the original seems to have been re-edited without noting the changes, although it still makes little sense.)

As I see it, there are two issues for holding bloggers to a basic standard of written communication (and I don’t care if this comment makes me a dinosaur, school marm or copy editor wanna-be):

Amateur or professional?

Blogging–writing or conversation?

If you’re blogging about your love of cats or Jean-Claude Van Damme, I don’t care about your grammar or spelling–I’ll make the effort to understand what you have to say.  I’ll see it as a conversation.

But if you’re running a commercial enterprise like the Huffington Post festooned with Subaru advertisements (and as LAObserved notes, not paying writers–not an issue for Laurie David, but a problem for the average freelancer) I expect readibility and cogent arguments. 

Ariana Huffington was originally known for her writing; if your name is on the publication, whether it’s Hearst or Huffington, your reputation is ultimately at stake.

Conversation or written communication, amateur or professional, here’s the bottom line: if I can’t discern your argument or understand your point, I can’t respond to your blog. 

Huffington Post reaches new low

October 23, 2007

Newspapers are edited for style, consistency and accuracy, among other things.  Should a group blog like The Huffington Post be as well? 

The question gains weight today with this post on the Malibu fires.  Although this blogger does capture memory and imagery, her post on a national site is remarkably poorly written.

The writer asks “Since when were there track homes in the multi-million dollar mansion area?” Perhaps she meant “tract” homes?

Both the first and last sentence make little sense, as the author can’t figure out what the subject is:
“Born and raised in Los Angeles, breaking news of a fire in Malibu is caught by a local resident to be no big surprise.”

The subject appears to be “breaking news” which was of course born and raised in Los Angeles.  Unless she meant ‘thought’ instead of ‘caught’, which still doesn’t make sense.  Simple would work better: “To a local resident born and raised in Los Angeles, breaking news of a fire in Malibu is no big surprise.”

The last sentence is even worse:

“Anticipating the idea that Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, or Lindsay Lohan’s beach houses in Malibu aren’t burning anytime soon, Malibu will be on the back burner once again until another premiere disaster strikes or is sent to rehab!”

All of Malibu needs to go to rehab? No no no!